I tried to turn to my heavy background in feminist theory and gender theory to try to understand this limiting devaluing of masculinity, but found a gap. Feminism hasn't dug down deep into masculinity the same way it has dug down deep into femininity, and those who are digging down deep into masculinity are often reproducing some sort of essentialist tripe that clashes with feminism and feels completely removed from explaining my own experience. I want a masculinist theory that grows out of feminism, that works with women instead of against, that understands that all the so-called "man-hating" issues of feminism have much more to do with backlash than with fundamental philosophies of the work.
So I have studied butch. I was not born with swagger: I learned it.I have studied butch. I was not born with swagger: I learned it. I earned it. I was not born knowing how to use a cock or tie a tie or match my belt to my shoes or court a girl or refrain from chivalry when it's not welcome or to contain something big and chaotic.I earned it. I was not born knowing how to use a cock or tie a tie or match my belt to my shoes or court a girl or refrain from chivalry when it's not welcome or to contain something big and chaotic. I have read everything I can, gone to the performances, asked my friends or perfect strangers for their definitions and understandings and hardships. I've found that most of the misunderstandings come from simple, basic sexism—simple, basic policings of masculinity—like when I ordered a vanilla vodka and cranberry from the bartender at my regular bar and she leaned over the counter, confidentially, and said, "Really? Are you sure? Because that's awfully ... sweet."
Implying, of course, that sweet drinks are for girls and wasn't I a guy? A guy's guy? A butch's butch? Come on, order something that'll put hair on your chest, like whiskey or beer!
Why the fuck can't I just order what I want to order?
It isn't just me, either. As I've been more confident and explorative in my presentation and understanding of my masculinity, I've been observing over and over the limitations of masculinity in others, and the effect these limitations have on all kinds of people with masculine presentations—gay boys, trans men, straight men, women who date men, female masculinity, men who are unemployed in this recession, non-traditional men like my yogi straight cis male roommate, anybody who loves or cares for or is related to or interacts with men or masculine people.
The restrictions and prescriptions for masculinity affect everybody.
There are so many rules of masculinity which are really fucking painful, to ourselves and to others. The competition, the fighting, the physical violence, the anger, the rage, the lack of emotional expression, the policing of each other's weaknesses, the presumption that someone masculine is always sexually available and is probably sexually promiscuous, the issues of commitment, the expectations of "bringing home the bacon."
Of course, it is not all bad. There are beautiful traits, too, care-taking and problem solving and the use of tools and innovative thinking and observation and leading others in passion and entering and embiggening and guiding energy in just the right way. There are many people doing all sorts of Radical Masculinity work already—butches, genderqueers, gender-non-conformist folks, masculine trans women, effeminate trans men, gay men, men who are professional pastry chefs, metrosexuals, guy yogis, feminist men, the "new" stay-at-home-dads, and all sorts of other aspects of masculinity that are still desperate to be explored.
So many questions about masculinity still remain: what are male traits? What makes a 'good man'? What is a positive presentation of masculinity? What are masculine traits? Sure, I can describe physical presentation and some sort of energy movement, but what about emotional traits, what about interpersonal traits? Is there any truth to the broad-sweeping concepts about men from one planet and women from another? Can we really make any emotional, psychological, or interpersonal conclusions by dividing people by gender? I remain unconvinced that those conclusions are much more than stereotypes.
But I do know that we need to continue struggling and stumbling into a new masculinity, a radical masculinity, a masculinity that is not painful for those who wear it or those who fall in love with it or for those who interact with it. Radical masculinity does not hurt. Radical masculinity is strong enough to be vulnerable and receptive enough to put his foot down. Radical masculinity is trans men and fairy fags and butches who do girly drag. Radical masculinity is straight women with cropped hair and tool belts marrying men, not apologizing, refusing to take the lesbian jokes personally. Radical masculinity is a new form of fatherhood, of manhood, of adulthood, of humanhood. Radical masculinity is feminist men doing real work for equality and liberation for everyone. Radical masculinity is football games with your daughter's ballet class and ice cream sundaes with your high school son's best friends. Radical masculinity is big cuddly bears and vicious hardcore dharma punx, urban cowboys and the sexiest MMA fighters, yogis and your brother with his new baby and yes even sometimes your dad, showing everyone that you can teach an old dog new tricks.
Radical masculinity is a way to present, perform, play with, celebrate, and liberate masculinity, in thousands of multi-dimensional expressions. It is still being created, recreated, formed, and reformed, and I want to be a part of its ongoing evolution.

Delicious
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo










Comments
Masculinity
For many men, masculinity is defined by behavior that attracts women. Women, especially feminized women, often say they want one sort of man, but are often sexually attracted toward a different sort of man. I think women need to realize how much like trained animals MOST men actually are. The behavior you reward, is the behavior that will be emulated. Being considerate, and respectful of women, has never earned me so much as the scent of vagina and being a jerk has. I lost my virginity to a woman 6 years my senior, i was 18, after telling her "Your too homely for my tastes but your friend is hot." I was raised in a liberal household, my mother was a working woman, I was raised to believe that that was a horrible thing to say, and yet that attitude was rewarded with intercourse. To me this was a clear indicator that being a dick got a positive response from women, especially after Nice Guying myself into the friend zone while assholes laid the girls i loved throughout my teen years.
As a grown man now, I've decided that women and their expectations and desires, and my ability to meet their demands, do not define my manhood. I've discovered that the ultimate display of manhood, is to do what you wanna do, and fuck what everyone thinks.
What is honestly more masculine, than telling EVERYONE, EVERYONE, to take their expectations and stereotypes, and shove them up their respective asses?
If none of this makes sense, then I apologize, because its Wednesday afternoon and I'm drunk. Thats right, I'm too masculine to wait until Friday like all you conformist pussies out there.
"Women, especially feminized
"Women, especially feminized women, often say they want one sort of man, but are often sexually attracted toward a different sort of man. I think women need to realize how much like trained animals MOST men actually are. The behavior you reward, is the behavior that will be emulated"
Number 1: you assume all women think the same way, this is as ridiculous as assuming all men think the same way - which you do. Number 2: It is insulting to men say that they are trained animals who only respond to the possibility of almighty Pussy. Men are not controlled by their sexual appetites any more than women.
"Being considerate, and respectful of women, has never earned me so much as the scent of vagina and being a jerk has."
Why not just be considerate and respectful of women because YOU SHOULD RESPECT AND BE CONSIDERATE OF PEOPLE? We are not masturbatory aids that need you to flick the right number of switches before catching your jizz.
I call troll.
That wasn't really the point
That wasn't really the point of his post.
I call flame.
Oh I think that was exactly
Oh I think that was exactly the point of his post. Or was the point finding a place to whine?
Radical masculinity
What are the positive traits that make us successful human beings? Can we impart and teach and imbue our cultures and our feelings for all the various "genders" with those? I want to offer a few traits, and perhaps others will add to the list:
Courage
Intrepid curiosity
Loving kindness
A sense of honor and personal Integrity
Enough empathy
Nimble intelligence
Sense of humor
Consideration
Creativity
Humility when appropriate
Largesse when appropriate
Sensuality
compassion self worth taking
compassion
self worth
taking responsibility for oneself
questingness
reverence
boldness
liberality and generousity
I like it. As Deleuze says,
I like it. As Deleuze says, "a thousand tiny sexes".
I'm saddened
I went through this whole article, hoping to see some examples of radical masculinity. And there was...not very much.
And that made me sad.
And then I noticed that this would be continued, that this was an introduction!
And that made me happy.
Hurry up and write more, Sugarbutch!
Excellent article, with
Excellent article, with several valid points. I'm actually writing an essay right now about how the movie The Big Lebowski shows these notions of evolving masculinity.
As a man who self identifies as a feminist, I know that there is an analysis gap between classical masculinity and classical femininity, and this makes it easy for men to write off feminism wholesale.
comment from the peanut gallery
Believe me when i say that i always enjoy your writing, but i do think your gender-related posts are the best. I've been reading your stuff for a few months now and a lot of it reminds me of the kind of discussions that spark up once in a while when i'm with my friends. Truth be told, said discussions are few and far between, and they tend to fizzle out before we're really able to get in depth. If anything, this is the direction i'd like to go in when we do have those chats and i would if given half the chance.
But that's not the reason i'm commenting. I'm commenting because i read a point that made me laugh my ass off. You wrote:
"Implying, of course, that sweet drinks are for girls and wasn't I a guy? A guy's guy? A butch's butch? Come on, order something that'll put hair on your chest, like whiskey or beer!
Why the fuck can't I just order what I want to order?"
It brings up a very funny issue that i've noticed quite a bit when i go out. If i'm wearing my typical outfit (jeans, button-down shirt, the occasional vest and/or tie) and i order a fruity drink, i often get odd looks. It's almost like i'm not acting butch enough. If, however, i go out in drag, the story is quite different.
When i'm in drag, the only thing that differs from my normal appearance is that i use mascara to add a bit of a 5 o' clock shadow. That's it. That's all it takes to make everyone assume i'm a young metrosexual man. And when a metrosexual dude orders a fruity drink and isn't getting it for the woman he's with, nobody thinks twice.
Apparently, it is more of a societal norm for a metrosexual guy to order a fruity drink than it is for an androgynous dyke to do the same thing.
It's not just a drink thing, of course. It's almost as if people expect me to be more masculine when i'm "butched up" than they do when i'm out in drag. When buying tampons, for instance, people either see a dyke who must know all about car maintenance, or a sweet young man on an errand for his girlfriend.
Anyway, that's pretty much all there is to my comment. Nothing important. Just wanted to add my two cents and to say that i really do enjoy reading what you post.
- Tristan
Hi. I think there's one main
Hi.
I think there's one main definitional issue - being and playing. A lot, if not most, of gender identities is actually a matter of performance. Yet there is a problem for all those who don't choose or have to choose their identity if there is no inherent meaning left to the definition of what they *ARE*. Performance of gender practices is about separating being from playing, but that separation is not one that can be easily made if you ARE a man.
I really don't know how to square this. How to allow complete personal freedom, let JD order an Appletini and hug Turk, while at the same time retain some meaning content to *being* a man rather than performing masculinity.
In the end, it seems, whatever it is, it is mostly defined by what feminine women prefer in men they then decide to have sex with.